<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Data Take-Down be a Right?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.torgo.com/blog/2009/05/should-data-take-down-be-a-right.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.torgo.com/blog/2009/05/should-data-take-down-be-a-right.html</link>
	<description>Musings on technology, the Web, mobility and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:09:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.torgo.com/blog/2009/05/should-data-take-down-be-a-right.html/comment-page-1#comment-325641</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torgo.com/blog/?p=345#comment-325641</guid>
		<description>Taking pictures of people in public whom you don&#039;t know is not illegal. You don&#039;t need their permission to include them in your pictures. Taking a picture of a person in &quot;private places&quot; within the public space is illegal. e.g. in a washroom stall or a changing room at the apparel store. 

Images and information stored with a business (regardless of their online and offline presence) are private and are subject to privacy laws.

I think the debate hinges on whether we deem social networking sites to be a public space, or we deem them to be a private place perhaps from the angle of information stored with a business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking pictures of people in public whom you don&#8217;t know is not illegal. You don&#8217;t need their permission to include them in your pictures. Taking a picture of a person in &#8220;private places&#8221; within the public space is illegal. e.g. in a washroom stall or a changing room at the apparel store. </p>
<p>Images and information stored with a business (regardless of their online and offline presence) are private and are subject to privacy laws.</p>
<p>I think the debate hinges on whether we deem social networking sites to be a public space, or we deem them to be a private place perhaps from the angle of information stored with a business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mery</title>
		<link>http://www.torgo.com/blog/2009/05/should-data-take-down-be-a-right.html/comment-page-1#comment-248562</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torgo.com/blog/?p=345#comment-248562</guid>
		<description>Data take down is only one tactic of a larger issue, and one that is not working well as the Cambridge research you mention has shown. I favour an approach based on information accountability and wrote up on this at 
http://gizmonaut.net/blog/writing/2008/09/information_accountability.html

You may also be interested by Bruce Schneier&#039;s essay at 
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/02/privacy_in_the.html

br -d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data take down is only one tactic of a larger issue, and one that is not working well as the Cambridge research you mention has shown. I favour an approach based on information accountability and wrote up on this at<br />
<a href="http://gizmonaut.net/blog/writing/2008/09/information_accountability.html" rel="nofollow">http://gizmonaut.net/blog/writing/2008/09/information_accountability.html</a></p>
<p>You may also be interested by Bruce Schneier&#8217;s essay at<br />
<a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/02/privacy_in_the.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/02/privacy_in_the.html</a></p>
<p>br -d</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

