<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dan's Blog (2.0) &#187; barclaycard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.torgo.com/blog/tag/barclaycard/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.torgo.com/blog</link>
	<description>Musings on technology, the Web, mobility and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:55:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>OnePulse: So Far, not so Good</title>
		<link>http://www.torgo.com/blog/2007/09/onepulse-so-far-not-so-good.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.torgo.com/blog/2007/09/onepulse-so-far-not-so-good.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 21:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Appelquist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barclaycard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onepulse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oystercard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thetube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torgo.com/blog/2007/09/onepulse-so-far-not-so-good.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update on the Barclaycard OnePulse. Apparently, getting an application out to me in the mail is too difficult for these guys because I haven&#8217;t received it yet. I also don&#8217;t quite understand why I have to re-apply for this card. Instead, shouldn&#8217;t I, as a valued Barclaycard customer living in London, have been offered the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/torgo/1418920525/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1122/1418920525_8bac7138b4_m.jpg" width="240" height="180" alt="Barclaycard Onepulse Ad on the London Tube" align="right"/></a>Update on the Barclaycard OnePulse. Apparently, getting an application out to me in the mail is too difficult for these guys because I haven&#8217;t received it yet. I also don&#8217;t quite understand why I have to re-apply for this card. Instead, shouldn&#8217;t I, as a valued Barclaycard customer living in London, have been offered the opportunity to upgrade/whatever to the OnePulse card? Big campaign behind this OnePulse thing all over the Tube (see inset: &#8220;Welcome to the Future.&#8221;) I don&#8217;t feel very welcome in your future, Barclaycard. In fact, I&#8217;m on the verge of canceling my existing card and writing the whole thing off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.torgo.com/blog/2007/09/onepulse-so-far-not-so-good.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smart Cards, Digital Money, Oyster and the Effective Use of a Hole Punch</title>
		<link>http://www.torgo.com/blog/2007/09/smart-cards-digital-money-oyster-and-the-effective-use-of-a-hole-punch.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.torgo.com/blog/2007/09/smart-cards-digital-money-oyster-and-the-effective-use-of-a-hole-punch.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Appelquist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barclaycard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digitalmoney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mastercard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oystercard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rfid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torgo.com/blog/2007/09/smart-cards-digital-money-oyster-and-the-effective-use-of-a-hole-punch.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Barclaycard (the credit card arm of Barclay&#8217;s, a major UK-based bank) is rolling out a new product, Onepulse, which more or less combines a few payment instruments into one card. Firstly, it&#8217;s a regular &#8220;chip and PIN&#8221; credit card, now ubiquitous across the UK. Secondly, it&#8217;s an Oyster card. Oyster is the brand name [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Barclaycard (the credit card arm of Barclay&#8217;s, a major UK-based bank) is rolling out a new product, Onepulse, which more or less combines a few payment instruments into one card. Firstly, it&#8217;s a regular &#8220;chip and PIN&#8221; credit card, now ubiquitous across the UK. Secondly, it&#8217;s an Oyster card. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oyster_card">Oyster</a> is the brand name for the smart card system now in use across London&#8217;s transport network. It&#8217;s a &#8220;touchless&#8221; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RFID">RFID</a> card that you can either load with money that decrements with each journey or with virtual tickets that allow unlimited travel over a period of time. Oyster has been around since 2003. The third instrument on this Onepulse card, however, is something new, at least for the UK. It&#8217;s called &#8220;Visa Onetouch&#8221; and appears similar to something MasterCard has rolled out in the U.S. called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paypass">Paypass</a>.</p>
<p>So why is this at all interesting?</p>
<p>Well. I&#8217;m always interested in new smart card technology and how it changes our behavior and impacts our society. I participated in a digital cash trial in Manhattan in 1997 (that <a href="http://www.efc.ca/pages/media/forbes.20jul98a.html">famously floundered</a>). I&#8217;m an early adopter of this kind of stuff, and I also am drawn to the promise of greater convenience. Convenience was a notably missing element from the Mondex trial in Manhattan (where you had to bring your card to a special equipped ATM and load money on it in order to bring it to a specially equipped vendor so they could schlep out a  huge multi-part card reader &#8211; for which you would have to use a separate pin in order to buy a 60¢ orange &#8211; the glares I got from these people, let me tell you!). The Paypass system, however, isn&#8217;t a separate stored value &#8212; it&#8217;s just an easier way to make regular credit card transactions for low (under £10) amounts. But will combining this contactless payment approach with the Oyster really yield greater convenience?</p>
<p>Like many other Londoners, I keep my Oyster card in a separate little wallet I can take out and wave at the Oyster terminal when I need it, instead of taking out my whole wallet and waving it around in a crowded Tube station. With a combined Oyster-Visa-Paypass card, it seems likely I&#8217;d take the same approach, but what if I want to use the card as a regular Visa card? It&#8217;s not clear to me how this will all work in practice.</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://digitaldebateblogs.typepad.com/digital_money/2007/08/contactless-upd.html">David Birch&#8217;s take</a> for more info on the Onepulse rollout, by the way.</p>
<p>So today I decided I&#8217;d try it out. I have to say, I&#8217;m not impressed so far with the application process. First of all, I am already a Barclaycard holder, so I can&#8217;t use the online form (according to very small text at the top of the form that I happened to read). Thanks. Ok I called customer service. After being transferred around for a while, I was told that I would have to &#8220;apply&#8221; for the card and that they couldn&#8217;t do it over the phone so they would have to send me forms in the mail. Is this really the future of digital money? I&#8217;ll keep a log here of the process of signing up for and using the Onepulse card.</p>
<p>The real holy grail, of course, is putting all of the above onto a&#8230; you guessed it&#8230; mobile phone. I know Transport for London is already doing trials on using NFC-enabled phones as Oyster cards (as reported by <a href="http://www.cardtechnology.com/article.html?id=20070824OQNZ9GSO">Card Technology</a> and discussed by Janko Mrsic-Flogel, TfL&#8217;s mobile technology guru, at <a href="http://mobilemonday.org.uk/2007/07/august-event-mobile-digital-identity.html">Mobile Monday London</a> last month). Fantasy, you say? The <a href="http://www.paymentsnews.com/2006/09/ntt_docomo_jr_e.html">Japanese</a> don&#8217;t think so&#8230;</p>
<p>One more footnote on this topic. I was out at dinner with a friend in the States earlier this year and I noticed that his credit card had a hole in it, approximately hole-punch size. I wanted to know &#8212; was this some new card feature? Turns out that, when he received his new Mastercard in the mail and found that it had a Paypass RFID chip on it, he took a hole punch to it and punched it out. Why? Because, as widely reported and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rfid#Security_concerns">summarized here</a>, there are very legitimate privacy concerns associated with RFID technologies (which is why privacy advocates have generally been up in arms about RFID&#8217;s use in machine-readable passports). I figure I&#8217;ve already destroyed any chance of digital privacy by becoming part of the Iris program, but I do wonder: will these technologies coming down at us, which are intended at least in part to reduce the threat of identity theft, instead encourage new and smarter methods of identity theft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.torgo.com/blog/2007/09/smart-cards-digital-money-oyster-and-the-effective-use-of-a-hole-punch.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
